Des Turcs laïcs accusent l'Ambassadeur
américain d'ignorer les avertissements contre la propagation d'un
islamisme radical en Turquie
Publié le : 03-11-2006
 |
Special Dispatch Series - No. 1345
November 3, 2006 No.1345
Secular Turks Criticize the U.S. Ambassador for Dismissing Warnings Against Rising Islamism in Turkey
During the first week of October 2006, a fierce secular-religious
debate broke out in Turkey when President Ahmet Necdet Sezer and top
Turkish military commanders warned of the growing threat of Islamist
fundamentalism in Turkey. [1]
That week, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was on an
official visit to the U.S. This visit was depicted as successful by
U.S. and Turkish government officials, and especially by the Islamic
press in Turkey, despite the ruling AKP's (Justice and Development
Party) invitation to Syria-based Hamas officials, [2] Turkey's drawing
closer to Iran and Syria at a time when the U.S. was trying to isolate
the two countries, and the rampant anti-Americanism in Turkey. [3]
Secular circles in Turkey have a long standing perception that the
U.S. has supported Prime Minister Erdogan and feared that he would
exploit this trip to garner U.S. support for his presidential bid in
2007, as well as for the AKP in the run-up to the November 2007 general
elections.
In the eyes of the secularists, hosting Erdogan in the White House
in December 2002, at a time when he was banned from politics due to his
Islamist past, opened the door to his becoming prime minister. The
secular - and increasingly nationalist - circles in Turkey have accused
the U.S. administration [4] of supporting Erdogan, and of creating the
concept of a Turkey of "moderate Islam" that would be a model for the
rest of the Muslim world. They insist that Turkey is and should remain
a secular, modern, and Western republic, as envisioned by its founder
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
In the midst of these concerns about possible U.S. support for the
ruling AKP, and fears of rising Islamism in Turkey - as expressed by
President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, generals, and high-ranking judicial
officials - U.S. Ambassador to Ankara Ross Wilson told a press
conference on October 4, 2006 that these warnings and the public debate
over the danger they pose to Turkey, were a "cacophony" - leading to
outrage from the country's secular circles.
While the secular media and the opposition parties have strongly
criticized Ambassador Ross Wilson's remarks (in some cases even calling
for his removal), reactions in the Islamist media have been mild. [5]
These statements were seen by secular circles in Turkey as U.S. support
for the AKP just a year in advance of general elections, and,
consequently as U.S. interference in internal Turkish politics.
The following are excerpts from the Turkish media on the controversy over U.S. Ambassador Ross Wilson's statements:
Ambassador Wilson: There's Always Cacophony in Turkish Politics, Media
The mainstream, large circulation Turkish daily Hurriyet reported:
[6] "U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Ross Wilson commented on the verbal
sparring that has taken place over the last few days between top
military and government officials over the 'threat of religious
fundamentalism' in Turkey. Wilson said yesterday, 'There has always
been a certain level of cacophony and noise in Turkish politics and the
media.' Wilson's statements on the 'fundamentalism' controversy in
Ankara came at a press conference yesterday, during which he briefed
reporters on the meeting in the U.S. capital between President George
W. Bush and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He noted, 'There is
nothing that worries me with regard to Turkey's continuation as a
strong, secure, stable and secular democracy.' […]"
Oktay Eksi of Hurriyet wrote in his column: [7] "It is believed
that diplomats are people whose ears hear what their mouths say, but
there are many tactless ones among them who are incapable of weighing
the consequences of their words. Some [diplomats] even [...] forget
that they are only 'representatives.' They attempt to rule the country
to which they are sent. If the real rulers of that country don't have
the necessary sensitivity to protect their national pride, the meddling
diplomat's job becomes easier. Then, the diplomat issues condescending
statements and acts arrogantly.
"[…] The U.S. Ambassador to Ankara Ross Wilson has blundered
occasionally [8] since he came here. But at a time when there is a
fierce [inner] debate [in Turkey] over 'whether or not there is a
threat of Islamist fundamentalism in Turkey,' to describe this [debate]
- and the political debate [in Turkey] […] - as 'cacophonic,' which
means a disharmonious, meaningless heap of words, amounts to disrespect
towards those who were parties to this debate. […]"
"What Kind of Ambassador is This?"
Columnist Fatih Altayli of the mainstream Sabah wrote: [9] "[…] I
found very odd the words of U.S. Ambassador Ross Wilson describing the
speeches by the Turkish president and the chief of general staff as
'cacophony.' To be more precise: I found it insolent. I thought that
this was exceeding of bounds [on the part of the Ambassador]. Ross
Wilson has no right, or any authority whatsoever, to make such
comments… [since] he is not a party to political discussions in Turkey.
[…] [nor is he] a colonial governor here… He is a diplomat. Therefore,
he must use diplomatic courtesy and must know his limits. There are
'cacophonic' debates in the U.S. too. There are debates about President
Bush, about Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and about the war in Iraq.
Yet the Turkish Ambassador [to Washington] does not attempt to meddle
in these debates.
"I don't know whether Ross Wilson has returned to Turkey yet. But I
know that as soon as he does, he must be summoned to the [Turkish]
Department of Foreign Affairs."
Ross Wilson is a "Colonial Governor, Not an Ambassador"
Columnist Hasan Pulur of the secular, mainstream Milliyet wrote:
[10] "The U.S. Ambassador called the debate on fundamentalism a
'cacophony,' meaning pandemonium, noise unpleasant to the ear… Who is
creating this cacophony - that is, who is doing the arguing on
fundamentalism? The [Turkish] president, prime minister, chief of
general staff [of the armed forces]...
"This man is not an ambassador, he is a colonial governor… Soon he might start yelling [at us] […], 'Shut up! Cut the noise!'"
Columnist Tufan Turenc of Hurriyet wrote: [11] "A man born and
raised in Turkey who has climbed to the highest position of the highest
court and who has been elected president says 'There is a threat of
fundamentalism.' Leaders of opposition parties voice the same concerns.
The heads of the [armed] forces and, then, the chief of staff of the
military warn the government of the increase in Islamist activities.
Moreover, these people form their opinions based on the state's
intelligence reports, rather than on rumor.
"Against all this, a voice is heard all the way from Washington
that belongs to someone who has known and seen Turkey for one year
only: 'There is no danger of fundamentalism [meaning Islamism] in
Turkey. Debate on fundamentalism is nothing but a cacophony...'. This
voice belongs to U.S. Ambassador Ross Wilson…
"Is Ambassador Wilson joking, or is he exceeding his bounds? How
dare this ambassador describe the words of this country's highest
officials in this manner? How can he freely trample on the basic rules
and principles of diplomacy? Does Mr. Ross Wilson think Turkey is a
colony of the U.S, and himself the colonial governor? How can he be so
arrogant?
"The silence of the AKP government and the Foreign Office is a sad
thing for the Republic of Turkey. […] Naturally, the prime minister
[Erdogan] is of the same opinion as the ambassador. According to him,
there is no fundamentalist threat in Turkey. The prime minister must
have closed his eyes and ears to everything that has been happening [in
Turkey] since he came to power. Otherwise, he would have seen the
murders [by radical Islamists] in the high court, the catastrophe in
the Ismailaga Mosque, and the 'liberated' [i.e. autonomous] areas ruled
by religious [Islamist] sects. [12] He [Erdogan] defines this as
extremism but not Islamism […].
"[…] Washington should know that the rising anti-Americanism in
Turkey cannot be curbed with such an ambassador. Unless the U.S.
understands the sensitivities of the Turkish people on the issues of
terrorism and Islamism, it cannot regain the trust that [it has] lost
in this land. […]"
Islamist Paper: U.S. State Dept. Says "Wilson Does a Great Job"
The Islamist daily Yeni Safak, which is known to be the unofficial
mouthpiece of the AKP government, reported: [13] "U.S. State Department
spokesman Sean McCormack said that U.S. Ambassador Ross Wilson is doing
a good job in Ankara. When asked to comment on the call by the Free
Party leader Yasar Okuyan to declare Wilson persona non grata,
McCormack said that he was not fully informed about the subject and
that he had 'not yet discussed it with Ross.' He added, 'Ross Wilson
does a great job in Turkey as ambassador.'"
Turkish Foreign Minister Gul on Bush-Erdogan Meeting: Extraordinary, Exceeded Our Expectations
Columnist Mustafa Karaalioglu of the Islamist daily Yeni Safak
wrote about the Bush-Erdogan meeting in Washington: [14] "[…]
Naturally, the most important issue was to see what the American
attitude towards the AKP government was, on the eve of the [Turkish]
presidential elections. […] The quality of the [U.S.-AKP] relationship
was the most important off-agenda issue during Erdogan's visit.
"[Despite] […] the growing speculation that Washington no longer
viewed the AKP in a positive light […] the first sign of the truth
[about the U.S.-AKP relationship] was that the meeting took much longer
than expected. After the meeting, Bush called Erdogan 'my friend and a
man of peace,' and announced that they were in agreement on all the
issues. No doubt this was an even stronger sign.
"After the press conference, I spoke to [Turkish] Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gul […]. He said, 'I am not exaggerating, this was an
extraordinary meeting. I can say that it was the best ever. [...]
Believe me, it was a meeting beyond our expectations.' During the
meeting the dialogue was friendly and Bush used the sentence, 'Only
strategic partners can have talks like this.' […]
"There was a surprise guest in the audience during Erdogan's
address [on October 3, 2006] at Georgetown University: World Bank
President Paul Wolfowitz. After the [rejection by the Turkish
parliament of the] March 1 motion [that would have allowed the U.S. to
open a front against Iraq from Turkish soil] [15] had cast a shadow on
U.S.-Turkey relations, Wolfowitz - the 'most hawkish' of the hawks in
Washington - had overreacted and had used […] disappointing words. From
this standpoint, it was interesting that Wolfowitz came to listen to
Erdogan. […] According to the prime minister's advisor, Egemen Bagis
[…] this was one of the signs of the beginning of a new era between the
two countries. […]"
Secular Columnist: "Bush Gave Both Legitimacy and International Cover to Erdogan"
Cengiz Candar, a Turkish columnist for the conservative daily Bugun, wrote in the English-language daily The New Anatolian: [16]
"Prime Minister Erdogan is once again at the White House. No matter
how turbulent Turkish-U.S. relations have become, it is an impressive
record for Turkey's prime minister to be received at the White House
four times in less than three years.
"The first time he stepped into the U.S. president's office in
December 2003 [sic], Erdogan was not prime minister. He wasn't even a
member of parliament. On the contrary, he was under threat of
prosecution in Ankara […] He [Erdogan] […] had been barred from running
[for elected office] […] And that was exactly why U.S. President George
W. Bush - through the efforts and effective counsel of the pro-Turkey
influential actor in the U.S. administration Deputy Defense Secretary
Paul Wolfowitz - received Erdogan at the White House. […]
"By receiving Erdogan in Washington before anyone else in the
government, Bush opened the way for him to climb to the post of prime
minister of Turkey - which he did within three months of his Washington
visit.
"It was Bush who gave both legitimacy and international cover to
Erdogan. He helped his ascent to power by implicitly tying the hands of
those in the Ankara establishment who wished and would have liked to
have seen Erdogan behind bars. […]
"That was not of course, a free lunch. Bush needed Turkey's active
support and even involvement for the looming war in Iraq that he was
determined to wage. Despite the March 1, 2003 debacle, which left a
bitter taste and a scar in Turkey-U.S. relations, the U.S.
administration exempted Erdogan [from any responsibility] for it. […]
[1] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1313, "Turkish President and
Military Warn of Increasing Islamism in Turkey, Point to AKP
Government," October 10, 2006,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=turkey&ID=SP131306
.
[2] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1114, "Hamas Visit to Turkey
Deepens Secular-Islamist Rift," March 14, 2006,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=turkey&ID=SP111406.
[3] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 870, "Anti-Americanism in the Turkish Media," February 25, 2005,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=turkey&ID=SP87005
; MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1147, "Turkey's Islamist Dailies Spread
Anti-American, Antisemitic Incitement," April 26, 2006,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=turkey&ID=SP114706.
[4] Among them was then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and then-Chairman of the Defense Policy Board Richard Perle.
[5] Ambassador Ross Wilson had further said that he saw nothing on the horizon that particularly worried him.
[6] Hurriyet (Turkey), October 4, 2006.
[7] Hurriyet (Turkey), October 5, 2006.
[8] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1114, "Hamas Visit to Turkey
Deepens Secular-Islamist Rift," March 14, 2006,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=turkey&ID=SP111406.
[9] Sabah (Turkey), October 5, 2006.
[10] Milliyet (Turkey), October 8, 2006.
[11] Hurriyet (Turkey), October 6, 2006.
[12] In May 2006, an Islamist attorney opened fire, shouting
"Allahu Akbar," inside Turkey's Supreme Court to protest the court's
decision against the headscarf; one judge was killed and several judges
and others were wounded. In September 2006, a gunman shot and killed
the imam of the Ismailaga Mosque, which is situated in an Islamist area
of Istanbul. The gunman was lynched by worshippers; no action was taken
against them and no arrests were made. As a result of the incident, the
Ismailaga sect's activities were exposed; these included the practice
of underground shari'a trials presided over by a qadi (Islamic judge).
[13] Yeni Safak (Turkey), October 13, 2006.
[14] Yeni Safak (Turkey), October 3, 2006.
[15] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 874, "Turkish Media on the
Anniversary of the March 1, 2003 Parliamentary Resolution Not Allowing
U.S. Troops to Open a Northern Front against Iraq from Turkish Soil,"
March 8, 2005,
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP87405.
[16] The New Anatolian (Turkey), October 5, 2006.
Retour à la rubrique
Source/Lien : Memri
|